Tuesday, February 10, 2015

How big business can innovate like a startup

[Blog post] Inside the Spotify model.

A true startup is like an artist, in that it is driven by an undeniable passion for its craft and an endless curiosity. The art is the goal, and the money and other trappings of success are a mere consequence.
It is not surprising therefore that big business struggles with innovation.


Enterprises are designed to be factories of repeatable and scalable business processes, whereas startups aim to change the world.

Unfortunately, this repeatable and scalable business model is not an agile and flexible one - it's the opposite.

One advantage of startups is they have the concept of a minimum viable product down pat - a working prototype that is stripped back and likely to be missing functionality. It's there to demonstrate the concept, and doesn’t have to be perfect.

Those working in enterprises know that big business tends to be sucked into the trap of making services ‘production ready’. Stakeholders want to see the full system, and there can be severe pressure against conducting a simple proof of concept.

In startups, the driver to achieve a MVP is simply a greater hunger to make that first sale, because until they do, they are burning cash. Enterprises just don’t have that same motivation and as a result find it really hard to build a minimum viable product.

It's not all bad news, however. Some organisations such as Spotify are leading the way as enterprises that get it. They have adopted approaches to use the stripped-back startup model and make it work for the big end of town.

The answer?
Spotify is a music streaming organisation that provides a freemium model with a paid option. It has 60 million users of which 15 million are paid members.  Spotify has used agile approaches to deliver innovation for a global company with multiple offices around the world.

It has tried to emulate how a startup works by forming teams into ‘squads’, which have a clear objective and are a part of larger incubators called 'tribes'.

To allow cross functional learning, Spotify also has guilds where experts can share and learn across different tribes. To allow for the reality of the enterprise, there is another construct called the 'chapter' - which in effect is line management.

Using this home-grown methodology, Spotify is able to create a high performance team within a successful and growing enterprise.


David Gee will explore the Spotify case study further during his CIO Strategy Summit keynote address on February 13th at the Grand Hyatt in Melbourne

Read more: http://www.itnews.com.au/BlogEntry/399730,how-big-business-can-innovate-like-a-startup.aspx#ixzz3R0RMTRrl

Monday, February 9, 2015

Step-by-step: preparing your business for big data


[Blog post] David Gee offers his practical tips.

Big data. It’s the hype-fuelled juggernaut that few CIOs can afford to ignore for any longer. But jumping on the bandwagon is not going to be easy. Here are some practical ways to make sure your organisation is ready to make the most of the deluge.

Consider a study tour
Alan Grogan, partner at Advanced Capability Solutions in London, says that letting third parties in on your big data plans can be vital “as this will help you later on if you need their buy-in and support with a project”.

But he adds a cautionary note.
“IT alone won’t be able to help you with commercialisation of your data into information and then business knowledge,” he said.  For this you will have to do some personal study and network heavily to get detail on user cases both in your sector and across other industries.
One way to accelerate this learning process is to seek out some expert guidance. An option is to undertake a ‘field trip’ to a handful of leading-edge analytics organisations based out of India and/or the USA.

Sri Annaswamy, founder at advisory firm Swamy & Associates, endorses this approach
“There are a number of options, with varying degrees of usefulness. You can buy a standard industry analyst report (Gartner, HF etc.) or a white-paper from a standard consulting firm (KPMG, Deloitte etc.) But neither option would provide the ‘hands on’ learning associated with being on an analytics factory floor during a field trip” he said.

Another learning to pursue is getting an idea of what an onshore and offshore analytics centre of excellence will feel like and indeed how this could work for your own enterprise. There is nothing like seeing an offshore centre in action and getting a sense for the talent pool that is in place.
The degree to which your business will consider ‘partnering versus owning’ is a key question. But certainly does not have to be answered immediately. This can definitely wait as you and your team learn by observation and also by osmosis.

Learn by outsourcing
Ok, so you want to learn more about this strategic topic – big data.

But you’re also aware that this skillset is in short supply and that no-one wants to expose their thinking or share information at this stage.

For those of us that are true-believers but lack the requisite deep experience, then the best way to learn is to consider outsourcing big data functions. From my own experience, I used this approach many years ago in another domain as I was establishing a customer contact centre for Asia Pacific.

This may sound counter intuitive, but it is actually the fastest way to learn what best practice looks like. From this position you can then decide whether you want to grow your capability internally or continue to outsource.

There is a saying that when the processes are a mess then you will be outsourcing a mess. It is true, but you can also learn from working with great partners.

Picking my partner?
For those of us that have been around a few seasons there are some common sense criteria for selecting a suitable partner. In essence you want to be buying high quality data analysts who have done this before in industries that you rate as being leaders of this new category.

Grogan has narrowed his advice down to four tips:
  1. For your specialist areas and projects you should have dedicated – ideally named – people who support only your business. This is not just to ensure analysts who ‘get’ your business, but also to protect any intellectual property.
  2. Be careful that the vendor lets you exclusively own any new processes they develop for you. This may sound obvious, but I’ve heard of companies effectively signing away their business models.
  3. Be careful of vendors using very fancy phrases, promising the latest technologies and overstating their capabilities. Be mindful that it’s known for consultancy and technology companies to ‘wash’ their capabilities with other more basic capabilities, and then re-outsource the difficult stuff. 
  4. Contact any potential vendor’s current big data clients and ask how their needs and wants have been supported.
Who should ‘own’ big data?
As a CIO, should big data even be your responsibility?
Alan Grogan says the way to approach this question is to forget about ‘ownership’ and ‘territory’.

For big data to succeed there needs to be a strong focus on the customer and an understanding that the culture of the organisation will evolve with this transformation.

“Big data ideally needs to be sponsored by a CEO (local, regional or global) who is the custodian of culture.

 “In terms of driving the agenda, the owning technology area (CTO/CDO/CIO) should really engage with each business area and function that stands to benefit. Over time, as big data processes become more embedded in the organisation, it’s not unimaginable that ownership will split between functional leaders (head of product, head of sales, head of finance) etc.”

He recommends that appointing a joint sponsor is the best approach, within the function or area which will fund the project. It’s critically important that this strategically positioned executive straddles the entire organisation and reports to the CEO.

Self-service philosophy
Big data demands self-service from day one. This is what will drive success. It is a long way from the traditional data warehouse and data mart approach and IT will have to evolve to work within this paradigm.

Let’s remember that the single-most important purpose of big data and analytics in an organisation is to enable end-users to go directly to the data source and carry out the analysis and visualisation they require directly, without relying on an IT-department-based BI and reporting team to prepare reports for them.

This approach shouldn't result in a lack of governance but it is radically different from how it was approached in the past. In effect, it means those of us in IT will have to let go of a little control.

One proof-of-concept is not enough
Cloud options have lowered the barriers to making a start with big data. But it is also important not to rush into anything that hasn’t been thoroughly tested.
The concept of testing big data through a proof of concept is clearly the recommended path.

In fact Annaswamy recommends enterprises don’t just run one POC “but three to five POCs in parallel, utilising different potential strategic analytics partners”.
He explained that this “helps accelerate proof of the value of big data and analytics to the executive and in a tangible manner as well as uncovering the specific capabilities of different service-providers in a defined timeframe and cost bound manner”.

What changes to the organisation are required?
One can argue that big data is naturally already the job of the CIO or CTO – so why would you hire a chief data officer or chief analytics officer?  I remember the rise and decline of chief knowledge officers that have come and since gone from the ranks of corporations.

My advice is: let’s not let this happen again, so IT, including the CIO, have to embrace this change.
There is still a need for an appropriate framework – with end-to-end data stewardship to drive data quality and make sure all data falls within a governance, risk and compliance framework. The most important thing is to get executives to grasp the importance of big data and analytics for every part of the company’s business.

Business gap analysis
A gap analysis is not a business case. Instead it is designed to illustrate how real the gap between your organisation and the industry leader(s) is – and how to bridge that gap.
Annaswamy maintains that the length of the review depends on the type of analytics project. In the case of a simple cross-sell uplift or an attrition problem project then it could be within 12 months.

However if it this is a complete revamp of your analytics platform, to say an enterprise data warehouse with the incorporation of a Hadoop-based system for unstructured data plus visualisation and newer software, you could be looking at a three-plus year scenario.

Copy cat – who should I benchmark?
Benchmarking against peers is the trickiest aspect because anyone that is doing this well is not going to share their intimate details.

Recently I was speaking to a CIO in Singapore who worked in an industry completely removed from my base in financial services. Despite my best attempts I could not convince him to divulge big data specifics.

But one hint is to look for organisations that are customer focussed, have made significant investments in this area and have appointed chief data or analytics officers.

In Australia it is understood that Suncorp and CBA are the most advanced in this space, but watch out for Walmart, AIG, Amazon, Google and Pay Pal.

Reskilling my team
I’ve been really curious about what skills are really needed to manage an outsourced big data capability. The most important part is managing the diversity of staff – standard IT developers, programmers and BI techies won’t do!

You will need engineers with strong statistical-modelling experience, behavioural scientists to pick out the insights and operations people to plug the insights into specific interventions.

There is an assumption of course that vendor management today is a given. Most organisations have been through the IT offshoring/BPO cycle for several years now that they have reasonably sophisticated procurement and vendor management teams.

Reinforcing this view was a further insight from Grogan that relationship and listening skills are all key. The biggest challenge is simply getting the outsourced capability stood up.

Friday, February 6, 2015

Is 2015 your chance to reinvent yourself?

Blog post] Consider targeting your skills to the hot trends.

It is a cliché to say that the world is changing as we speak, but it is indeed true.  There are roles in IT that won’t be in existence in five years time, or they will be considered roles of lesser value than today.

As IT professionals we need to be always reinventing ourselves, moving our skills to where the action is going to be – it is about preparing to fight the next battle not the last.  My view is that unfortunately this common sense is not that ‘common’ and many IT folks don’t believe they can easily move across specialist areas.
I feel that in Australia a career change is more feasible than some other locations. It’s about having the transferable skills that will take you from sitting in your own comfort zone to  tackling a completely new challenge.

What are the hot trends?
There are some key roles that are emerging, including: data scientists, cyber security experts, digital business analysts and cloud architects.
If you were going to take a punt on a career change, then I would pick one of these areas.
There is also a list of alternative hot spots that is not hyped or talked about as much. These are roles where there appears to be quite a shortage of skilled IT professionals like middleware integration analysts, COBOL programmers and mainframe skills in general.

Time for reflection.
My own motto is “life is too short to be doing a job that you don’t love”.  I’ve met many people who dislike or don’t enjoy their work and it always shows. It is hard to have ‘passion’ and ‘energy’ when you feel that your role is a dead end and leads nowhere.
Either way if you decided to go after a shiny new career in ‘Big Data’; there is clear evidence that there is a global shortage of skilled staff.  Similarly, the number of enquiries that I receive to refer cyber security specialists is staggering.  There is just not enough skilled staff to fill demand for any of the hot trends.
Taking the alternative path and moving into a legacy like COBOL can also provide great rewards as the skill is not being taught at all institutions but the requirement is still there.

Transferrable skill.
Getting an opportunity to get some experience with a new skill, as part of a project is one avenue to build a different career direction.
In 2015, should look for opportunities to learn new, or for that matter old, technologies.
Don’t die wondering. Have a discussion with your supervisor about your longer term career goals, your commitment to the organization and your desire to learn a new skill that both helps the business and grows your value.
The most important transferrable skill is actually not the technical aspects, as those can be learned, it’s your ‘positive’ attitude and ability to learn.
For example, taking a person that has for instance been an ERP specialist and having them transform into an information architect is clearly a long bow. This can be achieved when there is a positive and receptive individual who is willing to work as a team member.
Hence we could take any role and with the right coaching and mentoring, that person can move over a 2 year period into a new IT profession.

Barriers to entry.
You may be thinking, “Surely there are barriers that will prevent me from making the change?” Perhaps and it is likely that your request may be somewhat of a surprise at first to management.
I maintain that approaching this in the right manner will have you seen as an engaged employee that wants to progress and learn.
In my experience any good manager or supervisor will want you on their team.
Thus the biggest barrier is indeed you.  This has to start with an assessment of you.

SKEB=skills, knowledge, experience and behaviour.
One of the simplest and most effective tools that I have used is a piece of paper and pen. With some quiet time to reflect you can write down what are the skills, knowledge, experience and behaviour that I need for my next role. I came across this approach during my time in Japan and developed this matrix.

Your notes should feel like a stretch and not just a routine thing like completing a certification course.

The intention is to write just one objective for each of these dimensions and if you then feel comfortable share this with your manager.

In the example included here, I have identified three improvement areas in each section.


Developing a similar SKEB diagram would involve insights from your supervisor and I would envisage that this may require more than a single discussion.

“Do nothing” as an option.
This is always a possible approach, and it is likely that this may be acceptable. The acid test is do you love your job?

If your answer is “well…not really”, then it is not too late to reinvent yourself.
Take your time during this month to consider your future. It really is the best time of the year to take the opportunity and ask what’s important?

Have a great 2015 !